Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Laura Magee, Erika Molteni, Vicky Bowyer, Jeffrey Bone, Harriet Boulding, Asma Khalil, Hiten Mistry, Lucilla Poston, Sergio A. Silverio, Ingrid Wolfe, Emma Duncan, Peter von Dadelszen, and the RESILIENT Study Group
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 956 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-8 |
Journal | Nature Communications |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 22 Feb 2023 |
DOIs | |
Accepted/In press | 16 Jan 2023 |
E-pub ahead of print | 22 Feb 2023 |
Published | Dec 2023 |
Additional links |
Magee_Molteni_Bowyer_Bone_Boulding_Khalil_Mistry_Poston_Silverio_et_al._2023_Women_s_COVID_19_vaccine_uptake_Nature_Communications.pdf, 1.55 MB, application/pdf
Uploaded date:22 Feb 2023
Version:Final published version
Licence:CC BY
Women of reproductive age are a group of particular concern with regards to vaccine uptake, related to their unique considerations of menstruation, fertility, and pregnancy. To obtain vaccine uptake data specific to this group, we obtained vaccine surveillance data from the Office for National Statistics, linked with COVID-19 vaccination status from the National Immunisation Management Service, England, from 8 Dec 2020 to 15 Feb 2021; data from 13,128,525 such women at population-level, were clustered by age (18–29, 30–39, and 40–49 years), self-defined ethnicity (19 UK government categories), and index of multiple deprivation (IMD, geographically-defined IMD quintiles). Here we show that among women of reproductive age, older age, White ethnicity and being in the least-deprived index of multiple deprivation are each independently associated with higher vaccine uptake, for first and second doses; however, ethnicity exerts the strongest influence (and IMD the weakest). These findings should inform future vaccination public messaging and policy.
King's College London - Homepage
© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454