TY - JOUR
T1 - Need for Cognition as an Antecedent of Individual Innovation Behavior
AU - Wu, Chia Huei
AU - Parker, Sharon K.
AU - de Jong, Jeroen P.J.
N1 - Funding Information:
The data collection of this study was funded from the SME and Entrepreneurship Research Program, which is executed by EIM Business and Policy Research in Zoetermeer, the Netherlands. We would like to thank Kerrie Unsworth, Patrick Dunlop, and Wei Tain for providing comments on a previous draft of this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2011.
PY - 2014/9/1
Y1 - 2014/9/1
N2 - The authors propose that need for cognition, an individual’s tendency to engage in and enjoy thinking, is associated with individual innovation behavior. Moreover, drawing on an interactionist perspective, the authors suggest that need for cognition becomes more important when individuals face lower job autonomy and time pressure in their work. This is because, when these job characteristics are low, there is no contextual driving force for individual innovation, so personality has a stronger influence. In a multisource study of 179 employees working in a Dutch research and consultancy organization, the authors’ expectations were largely supported. They found that need for cognition was positively associated with peer-rated innovation behavior, as were job autonomy and time pressure, even when controlling for openness to experience and proactive personality. Furthermore, the relationship between need for cognition and innovation behavior was strongest for individuals with low job autonomy and low time pressure and indeed was nonexistent at high levels of these contextual variables. This study, therefore, suggests that context can substitute for an individual’s need for cognition when it comes to individual innovation.
AB - The authors propose that need for cognition, an individual’s tendency to engage in and enjoy thinking, is associated with individual innovation behavior. Moreover, drawing on an interactionist perspective, the authors suggest that need for cognition becomes more important when individuals face lower job autonomy and time pressure in their work. This is because, when these job characteristics are low, there is no contextual driving force for individual innovation, so personality has a stronger influence. In a multisource study of 179 employees working in a Dutch research and consultancy organization, the authors’ expectations were largely supported. They found that need for cognition was positively associated with peer-rated innovation behavior, as were job autonomy and time pressure, even when controlling for openness to experience and proactive personality. Furthermore, the relationship between need for cognition and innovation behavior was strongest for individuals with low job autonomy and low time pressure and indeed was nonexistent at high levels of these contextual variables. This study, therefore, suggests that context can substitute for an individual’s need for cognition when it comes to individual innovation.
KW - innovation
KW - job design
KW - personality
KW - proactivity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907079684&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0149206311429862
DO - 10.1177/0149206311429862
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84907079684
SN - 0149-2063
VL - 40
SP - 1511
EP - 1534
JO - JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT
JF - JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT
IS - 6
ER -