TY - JOUR
T1 - Networks underpinning emotion
T2 - A systematic review and synthesis of functional and effective connectivity
AU - Underwood, Raphael
AU - Tolmeijer, Eva
AU - Wibroe, Johannes
AU - Peters, Emmanuelle
AU - Mason, Liam
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London who funded RU and EP and the Medical Research Council who funded LM through a Clinician Scientist Fellowship ( MR/S006613/ 1).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Existing models of emotion processing are based almost exclusively on brain activation data, yet make assumptions about network connectivity. There is a need to integrate connectivity findings into these models. We systematically reviewed all studies of functional and effective connectivity employing tasks to investigate negative emotion processing and regulation in healthy participants. Thirty-three studies met inclusion criteria. A quality assessment tool was derived from prominent neuroimaging papers. The evidence supports existing models, with primarily limbic regions for salience and identification, and frontal areas important for emotion regulation. There was mixed support for the assumption that regulatory influences on limbic and sensory areas come predominantly from prefrontal areas. Rather, studies quantifying effective connectivity reveal context-dependent dynamic modulatory relationships between occipital, subcortical, and frontal regions, arguing against purely top-down regulatory theoretical models. Our quality assessment tool found considerable variability in study design and tasks employed. The findings support and extend those of previous syntheses focused on activation studies, and provide evidence for a more nuanced view of connectivity in networks of human emotion processing and regulation.
AB - Existing models of emotion processing are based almost exclusively on brain activation data, yet make assumptions about network connectivity. There is a need to integrate connectivity findings into these models. We systematically reviewed all studies of functional and effective connectivity employing tasks to investigate negative emotion processing and regulation in healthy participants. Thirty-three studies met inclusion criteria. A quality assessment tool was derived from prominent neuroimaging papers. The evidence supports existing models, with primarily limbic regions for salience and identification, and frontal areas important for emotion regulation. There was mixed support for the assumption that regulatory influences on limbic and sensory areas come predominantly from prefrontal areas. Rather, studies quantifying effective connectivity reveal context-dependent dynamic modulatory relationships between occipital, subcortical, and frontal regions, arguing against purely top-down regulatory theoretical models. Our quality assessment tool found considerable variability in study design and tasks employed. The findings support and extend those of previous syntheses focused on activation studies, and provide evidence for a more nuanced view of connectivity in networks of human emotion processing and regulation.
KW - Causal connectivity
KW - Dynamic causal modeling
KW - Effective connectivity
KW - Emotion
KW - Functional connectivity
KW - Healthy
KW - Human
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113291338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118486
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118486
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85113291338
SN - 1053-8119
VL - 243
JO - NeuroImage
JF - NeuroImage
M1 - 118486
ER -