Neurodiversity and Communication Ethics: How images of autism trouble communication ethics in the globital age

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neurodiversity and Communication Ethics

T2 - How images of autism trouble communication ethics in the globital age

AU - Reading, Anna

PY - 2018/11/28

Y1 - 2018/11/28

N2 - Human communication and communication ethics are configured through a culture of ‘normalcy’ which marginalises those with neurodivergent modalities of communication including autistic people. One ethical response to this marginalisation and othering of autistic people is what Nick Walker terms ‘neuroqueering’. Walker contends that neuroqueering involves creating artefacts that foreground neurodiversity including showing and using neurodivergent forms of communication which challenges or points reinterpretations of neurotypical communication and culture. This article asks how and in what ways do digital artefacts, such as videos of and by autistic people made and shared through the affordances of the globital age, neuroqueer the cultural history of troubled and troubling images of autistic people? To what extent do these images trouble neurotypical assumptions about the ethics of images and enrich and deepen understanding of communication ethics more broadly?Building on research that has addressed the ways in which autism is represented in popular culture, in literature and in film, this research examines autistic cultural assemblages8 afforded by the globital age. Empirically, I focus on analysing an assemblage of on-line videos by and about autistic people: self-advocacy You Tube videos made by and with autistic people, a campaign video made by the UK’s National Autistic Society, and films as ‘translations’ of a nonverbal autistic world. These, I argue, offer ethical arguments for understanding the sensorial, perceptual, cognitive and communicative diversity of human meaning making including recognising the significance of communication by and with the material world and non-human persons.

AB - Human communication and communication ethics are configured through a culture of ‘normalcy’ which marginalises those with neurodivergent modalities of communication including autistic people. One ethical response to this marginalisation and othering of autistic people is what Nick Walker terms ‘neuroqueering’. Walker contends that neuroqueering involves creating artefacts that foreground neurodiversity including showing and using neurodivergent forms of communication which challenges or points reinterpretations of neurotypical communication and culture. This article asks how and in what ways do digital artefacts, such as videos of and by autistic people made and shared through the affordances of the globital age, neuroqueer the cultural history of troubled and troubling images of autistic people? To what extent do these images trouble neurotypical assumptions about the ethics of images and enrich and deepen understanding of communication ethics more broadly?Building on research that has addressed the ways in which autism is represented in popular culture, in literature and in film, this research examines autistic cultural assemblages8 afforded by the globital age. Empirically, I focus on analysing an assemblage of on-line videos by and about autistic people: self-advocacy You Tube videos made by and with autistic people, a campaign video made by the UK’s National Autistic Society, and films as ‘translations’ of a nonverbal autistic world. These, I argue, offer ethical arguments for understanding the sensorial, perceptual, cognitive and communicative diversity of human meaning making including recognising the significance of communication by and with the material world and non-human persons.

KW - autism

KW - neurodiversity

KW - neuroqueer

KW - ethics

KW - social media

KW - ASD

KW - autobiography

KW - communication

KW - memory

U2 - 10.5130/csr.v24i2.6040

DO - 10.5130/csr.v24i2.6040

M3 - Article

SN - 1446-8123

VL - 24

SP - 113

EP - 129

JO - Cultural Studies Review

JF - Cultural Studies Review

IS - 2

ER -