Never a Simple Choice: Claude S. Beck and the Definitional Surplus in Decision Making about CPR

Geoffrey Rees, Daniel Brauner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Each time patients and their families are asked to make a decision about resuscitation, they are also asked to engage the political, social, and cultural concerns that have shaped its history. That history is exemplified in the career of Claude S. Beck, arguably the most influential researcher and teacher of resuscitation in the twentieth century. Careful review of Beck’s work discloses that the development and popularization of the techniques of resuscitation proceeded through a multiplication of definitions of death. CPR consequently remains unique among medical treatments, because it is indicated precisely when a person dies, depending always on how each event of death becomes defined practically by patients, families, and medical professionals present at the time. It is therefore as an occasion to manage a surplus of definitions of death, and not as an occasion to determine the physiological efficacy of resuscitation, that one should approach analysis of contemporary challenges in decision-making about resuscitation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-101
Number of pages11
JournalMedicine Studies
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Never a Simple Choice: Claude S. Beck and the Definitional Surplus in Decision Making about CPR'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this