Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 16 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-24 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | ACM Transactions on Parallel Computing |
Volume | 6 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 30 Nov 2019 |
DOIs | |
Accepted/In press | 5 Aug 2019 |
E-pub ahead of print | 30 Nov 2019 |
Published | Dec 2019 |
Additional links |
New Cover Time Bounds_COOPER_Acc5Aug2019Epub30Nov2019_GREEN AAM
New_Cover_Time_Bounds_COOPER_Acc5Aug2019Epub30Nov2019_GREEN_AAM.pdf, 652 KB, application/pdf
Uploaded date:09 Jan 2020
Version:Accepted author manuscript
We present new bounds on the cover time of the coalescing-branching random walk process COBRA. The COBRA process, introduced in Dutta et al. [9], can be viewed as spreading a single item of information throughout an undirected graph in synchronised rounds. In each round, each vertex that has received the information in the previous round (possibly simultaneously from more than one neighbour and possibly not for the first time), "pushes" the information to k randomly selected neighbours. The COBRA process is typically studied for integer branching rates k ≥ 2 (with the case k = 1 corresponding to a random walk). The aim of the process is to propagate the information quickly, but with a limited number of transmissions per vertex per round. The COBRA cover time is the expected number of rounds until all vertices have received the information at least once. Our main results are bounds of O(m + (dmax)2 logn) and O(m logn) on the COBRA cover time for arbitrary connected graphs with n vertices, m edges and maximum graph degree dmax, and bounds of O((r 2 + r/(1 - λ)) logn) and O((1/(1 - λ)2) logn) for r -regular connected graphs with the second largest eigenvalue λ in absolute value. Our bounds for general graphs are always O(n2 logn), decreasing to O(n) for constant degree graphs, while the best previous bound is O(n2.75 logn). Our first bound for regular graphs applied to the lazy variant of the COBRA process is O((r 2 + r/φ2) logn), where φ is the conductance of the graph. The best previous results for the COBRA process imply for this case only a bound of O((r 4/φ2) log2 n). To derive our bounds, we develop the following new approach to analysing the performance of the COBRA process. We introduce a type of infection process, which we call the Biased Infection with Persistent Source (BIPS) process, show that BIPS can be viewed as dual to COBRA, and obtain bounds for COBRA by analysing the convergence of BIPS.
King's College London - Homepage
© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454