New thinking, innateness and inherited representation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)
202 Downloads (Pure)


The New Thinking contained in this volume rejects an Evolutionary Psychology that is committed to innate domain-specific psychological mechanisms: gene-based adaptations that are unlearnt, developmentally fixed and culturally universal. But the New Thinking does not simply deny the importance of innate psychological traits. The problem runs deeper: the concept of innateness is not suited to distinguishing between the New Thinking and Evolutionary Psychology. That points to a more serious problem with the concept of innateness as it is applied to human psychological phenotypes. This paper argues that the features of recent human evolution highlighted by the New Thinking imply that the concept of inherited representation, set out here, is a better tool for theorizing about human cognitive evolution.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2234-2244
Number of pages12
JournalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences
Issue number1599
Early online date25 Jun 2012
Publication statusPublished - 5 Aug 2012


Dive into the research topics of 'New thinking, innateness and inherited representation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this