TY - JOUR
T1 - Non-parental care in childhood and health up to 30 years later
T2 - ONS Longitudinal Study 1971-2011
AU - Murray, Emily T.
AU - Lacey, Rebecca
AU - Maughan, Barbara
AU - Sacker, Amanda
PY - 2020/12/11
Y1 - 2020/12/11
N2 - BACKGROUND: Children who spend time in non-parental care report worse health later in life on average, but less is known about differences by type of care. We examined whether self-rated health of adults who had been in non-parental care up to 30 years later varied by type of care. METHODS: We used longitudinal data from the office for National Statistics Longitudinal Study. Participants were aged <18 and never-married at baseline of each census year from 1971 to 2001. Separately for each follow-up period (10, 20 and 30 years later), multi-level logistic regression was used to compare self-rated health outcomes by different care types. RESULTS: For combined census years, sample sizes were 157 896 dependent children with 10 years of follow-up, 166 844 with 20 years of follow-up and 173 801 with 30 years of follow-up. For all follow-up cohorts, longitudinal study members who had been in care in childhood, had higher odds of rating their health as 'not good' vs. 'good'; with highest odds for residential care. For example, 10-year follow-up odds ratios were 3.5 (95% confidence interval: 2.2-5.6) for residential care, 2.1 (1.7-2.5) for relative households and 2.6 (2.1-3.3) for non-relative households, compared with parental households after adjustment for childhood demographics. Associations were weakest for 10-year, and strongest for 20-year, follow-up. Additional adjustment for childhood social circumstances reduced, but did not eliminate, associations. CONCLUSION: Decades after children and young people are placed in care, they are still more likely to report worse health than children who grew up in a parental household.
AB - BACKGROUND: Children who spend time in non-parental care report worse health later in life on average, but less is known about differences by type of care. We examined whether self-rated health of adults who had been in non-parental care up to 30 years later varied by type of care. METHODS: We used longitudinal data from the office for National Statistics Longitudinal Study. Participants were aged <18 and never-married at baseline of each census year from 1971 to 2001. Separately for each follow-up period (10, 20 and 30 years later), multi-level logistic regression was used to compare self-rated health outcomes by different care types. RESULTS: For combined census years, sample sizes were 157 896 dependent children with 10 years of follow-up, 166 844 with 20 years of follow-up and 173 801 with 30 years of follow-up. For all follow-up cohorts, longitudinal study members who had been in care in childhood, had higher odds of rating their health as 'not good' vs. 'good'; with highest odds for residential care. For example, 10-year follow-up odds ratios were 3.5 (95% confidence interval: 2.2-5.6) for residential care, 2.1 (1.7-2.5) for relative households and 2.6 (2.1-3.3) for non-relative households, compared with parental households after adjustment for childhood demographics. Associations were weakest for 10-year, and strongest for 20-year, follow-up. Additional adjustment for childhood social circumstances reduced, but did not eliminate, associations. CONCLUSION: Decades after children and young people are placed in care, they are still more likely to report worse health than children who grew up in a parental household.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098472261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa113
DO - 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa113
M3 - Article
C2 - 32683447
AN - SCOPUS:85098472261
SN - 1101-1262
VL - 30
SP - 1121
EP - 1127
JO - European journal of public health
JF - European journal of public health
IS - 6
ER -