King's College London

Research portal

Non-invasive classification of non-small cell lung cancer: a comparison between random forest models utilising radiomic and semantic features

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Usman Bashir, Bhavin Kawa, Muhammad Siddique, Sze Mun Mak, Arjun Nair, Emma Mclean, Andrea Bille, Vicky Goh, Gary Cook

Original languageEnglish
Article number20190159
Pages (from-to)20190159
JournalBritish Journal of Radiology
Volume92
Issue number1099
Early online date5 Jun 2019
DOIs
Accepted/In press4 Apr 2019
E-pub ahead of print5 Jun 2019

Documents

King's Authors

Abstract

Objective: Non-invasive distinction between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma subtypes of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may be beneficial to patients unfit for invasive diagnostic procedures or when tissue is insufficient for diagnosis. The purpose of our study was to compare the performance of random forest algorithms utilizing CT radiomics and/or semantic features in classifying NSCLC. Methods: Two thoracic radiologists scored 11 semantic features on CT scans of 106 patients with NSCLC. A set of 115 radiomics features was extracted from the CT scans. Random forest models were developed from semantic (RM-sem), radiomics (RM-rad), and all features combined (RM-all). External validation of models was performed using an independent test data set (n = 100) of CT scans. Model performance was measured with out-of-bag error and area under curve (AUC), and compared using receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis on the test data set. Results: The median (interquartile-range) error rates of the models were: RF-sem 24.5 % (22.6 - 37.5 %), RF-rad 35.8 % (34.9 - 38.7 %), and RM-all 37.7 % (37.7 - 37.7). On training data, both RF-rad and RF-all gave perfect discrimination (AUC = 1), which was significantly higher than that achieved by RF-sem (AUC = 0.78; p < 0.0001). On test data, however, RM-sem model (AUC = 0.82) out-performed RM-rad and RM-all (AUC = 0.5 and AUC = 0.56; p < 0.0001), neither of which was significantly different from random guess ( p = 0.9 and 0.6 respectively). Conclusion: Non-invasive classification of NSCLC can be done accurately using random forest classification models based on well-known CT-derived descriptive features. However, radiomics-based classification models performed poorly in this scenario when tested on independent data and should be used with caution, due to their possible lack of generalizability to new data. Advances in knowledge: Our study describes novel CT-derived random forest models based on radiologist- interpretation of CT scans (semantic features) that can assist NSCLC classification when histopathology is equivocal or when histopathological sampling is not possible. It also shows that random forest models based on semantic features may be more useful than those built from computational radiomic features.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454