Nothing to it?: Generalized Identity and Zero-Grounding

Jessica Leech

Nothing to it?: Generalized Identity and Zero-Grounding

Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to make some headway in understanding the notion of zero-grounding. The account of grounding in terms of generalized identity, proposed by Correia and Skiles (2019), is employed to clarify issues of ground and zero-ground. I discuss some options for accommodating zero-grounding. According to one option, we slide dangerously close to violating the irreflexivity of ground. According to another option, zero-grounding leads to a worrying kind of overdetermination. A third option offers a way out, but a challenge remains of how best to make sense of it. I further contend that these arguments broaden to concern any notion of grounding according to which groundees are “nothing over and above” their grounds. Ultimately, the aim of this paper is exploratory. It lays out some of the different options and challenges that face the grounding theorist who wants to make sense of zero-grounding.

Original language	English
Journal	PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES
Publication status	Accepted/In press - 12 Nov 2024

Embargoed Document

Nothing To It_final author version
Accepted author manuscript, 406 KB
Embargo ends: 12/11/2025

Cite this

@article{5ee9bfb271314f2f8b77a8367b8d7de2,

title = "Nothing to it?: Generalized Identity and Zero-Grounding",

abstract = "The aim of this paper is to make some headway in understanding the notion of zero-grounding. The account of grounding in terms of generalized identity, proposed by Correia and Skiles (2019), is employed to clarify issues of ground and zero-ground. I discuss some options for accommodating zero-grounding. According to one option, we slide dangerously close to violating the irreflexivity of ground. According to another option, zero-grounding leads to a worrying kind of overdetermination. A third option offers a way out, but a challenge remains of how best to make sense of it. I further contend that these arguments broaden to concern any notion of grounding according to which groundees are “nothing over and above” their grounds. Ultimately, the aim of this paper is exploratory. It lays out some of the different options and challenges that face the grounding theorist who wants to make sense of zero-grounding.",

author = "Jessica Leech",

year = "2024",

month = nov,

day = "12",

language = "English",

journal = "PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES",

issn = "0031-8116",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nothing to it?: Generalized Identity and Zero-Grounding

AU - Leech, Jessica

PY - 2024/11/12

Y1 - 2024/11/12

N2 - The aim of this paper is to make some headway in understanding the notion of zero-grounding. The account of grounding in terms of generalized identity, proposed by Correia and Skiles (2019), is employed to clarify issues of ground and zero-ground. I discuss some options for accommodating zero-grounding. According to one option, we slide dangerously close to violating the irreflexivity of ground. According to another option, zero-grounding leads to a worrying kind of overdetermination. A third option offers a way out, but a challenge remains of how best to make sense of it. I further contend that these arguments broaden to concern any notion of grounding according to which groundees are “nothing over and above” their grounds. Ultimately, the aim of this paper is exploratory. It lays out some of the different options and challenges that face the grounding theorist who wants to make sense of zero-grounding.

AB - The aim of this paper is to make some headway in understanding the notion of zero-grounding. The account of grounding in terms of generalized identity, proposed by Correia and Skiles (2019), is employed to clarify issues of ground and zero-ground. I discuss some options for accommodating zero-grounding. According to one option, we slide dangerously close to violating the irreflexivity of ground. According to another option, zero-grounding leads to a worrying kind of overdetermination. A third option offers a way out, but a challenge remains of how best to make sense of it. I further contend that these arguments broaden to concern any notion of grounding according to which groundees are “nothing over and above” their grounds. Ultimately, the aim of this paper is exploratory. It lays out some of the different options and challenges that face the grounding theorist who wants to make sense of zero-grounding.

M3 - Article

SN - 0031-8116

JO - PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES

JF - PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES

ER -

Nothing to it?: Generalized Identity and Zero-Grounding

Abstract

Embargoed Document

Fingerprint

Cite this