King's College London

Research portal

Offering disinclined people the choice between different screening appointments: a randomised online survey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sandro Tiziano Stoffel, Yasemin Hirst, Alex Ghanouni, Jo Waller, Christian von Wagner

Original languageEnglish
JournalPsychology and Health
DOIs
Accepted/In press2020

King's Authors

Abstract

Objectives: An invitation to cancer screening with a single (fixed) appointment time has been shown to be a more effective way at increasing uptake compared with an invitation with an open (unscheduled) appointment. The present study tested whether offering more than one fixed appointment could further enhance this effect or be detrimental to people’s intention. Design: Experimental online hypothetical vignette survey. Methods: 1,908 respondents who stated that they did not intend to participate in Bowel Scope Screening (BSS) were offered either one, two, four or six hypothetical fixed BSS appointments (all of which covered the same time of day to control for individual preferences). Results: Participants who were given more than one appointment to choose from were less likely to intend to book an appointment despite multiple appointments being perceived as more convenient. Conclusions: These results suggest that when it comes to offering people appointments for cancer screening, less (choice) is more, at least if alternatives fail to serve an inherent preference.

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454