Open Peer Commentary: On the Too Often Overlooked Radicality of Neurophenomenology

Michel Bitbol, Elena Antonova

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)


Open peer commentary on the article “Never Mind the Gap: Neurophenomenology, Radical Enactivism, and the Hard Problem of Consciousness” by Michael D. Kirchhoff & Daniel D. Hutto. Upshot: We point out that the significance of the neurophenomenological approach to the “hard problem” of consciousness is underrated and misunderstood by the authors of the target article. In its original version, neurophenomenology implies nothing less than a change in our own being to dispel the mere sense that there is a problem to be theoretically solved or dissolved. Neurophenomenology thus turns out to be much more radical than the enactivist kind of dissolution promoted by the authors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)354-356
Number of pages3
JournalConstructivist Foundations
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 15 Mar 2016


Dive into the research topics of 'Open Peer Commentary: On the Too Often Overlooked Radicality of Neurophenomenology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this