Optic disc planimetry, corneal hysteresis, central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure as risk factors for glaucoma

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optic disc planimetry, corneal hysteresis, central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure as risk factors for glaucoma

AU - Carbonaro, Francis

AU - Hysi, Pirro G

AU - Fahy, Samantha J

AU - Nag, Abhishek

AU - Hammond, Christopher J

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - PurposeTo determine whether corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness are independent risk factors for glaucoma.DesignA cross-sectional population-based cohort study.MethodsAssociations were tested between corneal hysteresis, measured in 1754 population-based subjects from the TwinsUK cohort, and glaucoma-related endophenotypes, including intraocular pressure (IOP), vertical cup-to-disc ratio, optic disc area, and optic disc cup area. Corneal hysteresis, IOP, and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured; optic disc photographs were analyzed; and multivariable linear regression analysis was performed.ResultsData were available on 1645 individuals. Multiple regression analysis showed corneal hysteresis to be significantly negatively associated with age (beta coefficient = −0.03, P < .00005) and IOP (beta coefficient = −0.06, P < .00005). Corneal hysteresis was also found to be associated with CCT (beta coefficient = 0.02, P < .0005). There was no significant association between corneal hysteresis and optic disc area (P = .6), cup area (P = .77), vertical cup-to-disc ratio (P = .51), or spherical equivalent (P = .08). CCT was also found to be significantly associated with IOP (beta coefficient = 3.3, P < .0005) and corneal hysteresis (beta coefficient = 9.4, P < .0005), but not with age (P = .59) or spherical equivalent (P = .16).ConclusionIn this large cohort of healthy British twins, we found no relationship between corneal hysteresis or CCT and quantitative measures of optic disc cupping, suggesting that corneal hysteresis and CCT are not independent risk factors for glaucoma.

AB - PurposeTo determine whether corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness are independent risk factors for glaucoma.DesignA cross-sectional population-based cohort study.MethodsAssociations were tested between corneal hysteresis, measured in 1754 population-based subjects from the TwinsUK cohort, and glaucoma-related endophenotypes, including intraocular pressure (IOP), vertical cup-to-disc ratio, optic disc area, and optic disc cup area. Corneal hysteresis, IOP, and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured; optic disc photographs were analyzed; and multivariable linear regression analysis was performed.ResultsData were available on 1645 individuals. Multiple regression analysis showed corneal hysteresis to be significantly negatively associated with age (beta coefficient = −0.03, P < .00005) and IOP (beta coefficient = −0.06, P < .00005). Corneal hysteresis was also found to be associated with CCT (beta coefficient = 0.02, P < .0005). There was no significant association between corneal hysteresis and optic disc area (P = .6), cup area (P = .77), vertical cup-to-disc ratio (P = .51), or spherical equivalent (P = .08). CCT was also found to be significantly associated with IOP (beta coefficient = 3.3, P < .0005) and corneal hysteresis (beta coefficient = 9.4, P < .0005), but not with age (P = .59) or spherical equivalent (P = .16).ConclusionIn this large cohort of healthy British twins, we found no relationship between corneal hysteresis or CCT and quantitative measures of optic disc cupping, suggesting that corneal hysteresis and CCT are not independent risk factors for glaucoma.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.10.017

DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.10.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 24211362

SN - 0002-9394

VL - 157

SP - 441

EP - 446

JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology

IS - 2

M1 - N/A

ER -