King's College London

Research portal

Outcome Study of the Pipeline Embolization Device with Shield Technology in Unruptured Aneurysms (PEDSU)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

D. Atasoy, N. Kandasamy, J. Hart, J. Lynch, S.H. Yang, D. Walsh, C. Tolias, T.C Booth

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2094-2101
Number of pages8
JournalAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology
Volume40
Issue number12
Early online date14 Nov 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2019

Documents

  • Outcome Study of the_ATASOY_Acc20Sep2019Epub14Nov2019_GOLD _VoR

    Outcome_Study_of_the_ATASOY_Acc20Sep2019Epub14Nov2019_GOLD_VoR.pdf, 1.03 MB, application/pdf

    21/11/2019

    Final published version

    White Open Access: Review Articles and government-funded Original Research articles from all countries of origin
    Immediate Open Access option available to all other authors for a modest surcharge

King's Authors

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The recently introduced Pipeline Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology (Pipeline Shield) is the third generation of Pipeline flow-diverter devices. It has a new stent-surface modification, which reduces thrombogenicity. We aimed to evaluate clinical and radiographic (safety and efficacy) outcomes of the Pipeline Shield. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 30-day and 1-year mortality and morbidity rates and the 6- and 18-month radiographic aneurysm occlusion outcomes for procedures performed between March 2016 and January 2018 were analyzed. 3D-TOF-MRA was used for follow-up. RESULTS: Forty-four attempted Pipeline Shield procedures were performed for 41 patients with 44 target aneurysms (total of 52 aneurysms treated). A total of 88.5% of devices were inserted in the anterior circulation, and 11.5%, in the posterior circulation; 49/52 (94.2%) aneurysms were saccular; and 1/52 (1.9%) was fusiform. One (1.9%) aneurysm was an iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm, and 1 (1.9%) was a dissecting aneurysm. Seventy-one percent (35/49) of the saccular aneurysms were wide-neck (neck, >4 mm), 34.6% (18/52) were large (≥10 mm), and 3.8% (2/52) were giant (≥25 mm). The mean aneurysm sac maximal diameter was 9.0 mm, and the mean neck width was 5.0 mm. The cumulative mortality and morbidity rates were 2.3% and 6.8% at 1 year, respectively. The adequate occlusion rate was 78.8% at 6 months and 90.3% at 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: In this pragmatic and non-industry-sponsored study, the occlusion rates and safety outcomes were similar to those seen in previously published studies with flow-diverter devices and earlier generation Pipeline Embolization Devices.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454