Overpowering. (How the powers ontology has over-reached itself)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

70 Citations (Scopus)
500 Downloads (Pure)


Many authors have argued in favour of an ontology of properties as powers , and it has been widely argued that this ontology allows us to address certain philosophical problems in novel and illuminating ways, for example, causation, representation, intentionality, free will and liberty. I argue that the ontology of powers, even if successful as an account of fundamental natural properties, does not provide the insight claimed as regards the aforementioned non-fundamental phenomena. I illustrate this argument by criticizing the powers theory of causation presented by Mumford and Anjum (2011) and showing that related criticisms can be directed at other abuses of (the ontology of) powers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)341-883
Number of pages543
Issue number498
Early online date27 Apr 2016
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2016


Dive into the research topics of 'Overpowering. (How the powers ontology has over-reached itself)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this