King's College London

Research portal

Overpowering. (How the powers ontology has over-reached itself)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)341-883
Number of pages543
JournalMIND
Volume125
Issue number498
Early online date27 Apr 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2016

Documents

King's Authors

Abstract

Many authors have argued in favour of an ontology of properties as powers , and it has been widely argued that this ontology allows us to address certain philosophical problems in novel and illuminating ways, for example, causation, representation, intentionality, free will and liberty. I argue that the ontology of powers, even if successful as an account of fundamental natural properties, does not provide the insight claimed as regards the aforementioned non-fundamental phenomena. I illustrate this argument by criticizing the powers theory of causation presented by Mumford and Anjum (2011) and showing that related criticisms can be directed at other abuses of (the ontology of) powers.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454