TY - JOUR
T1 - Participants' experiences and acceptability of a home-based walking exercise behaviour-change intervention (MOtivating Structure walking Activity in people with Intermittent Claudication (MOSAIC))
AU - Volkmer, Brittannia
AU - Sekhon, Mandeep
AU - Bieles, Julie
AU - Fisher, Graham
AU - Galea Holmes, Melissa N
AU - Quirke-McFarlane, Sophia
AU - Modarai, Bijan
AU - Peacock, Janet
AU - Sackley, Catherine
AU - Weinman, John
AU - Bearne, Lindsay M
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by a grant from the Dunhill Medical Trust , United Kingdom ( R477/0516 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - Objectives: This study explored the experiences and acceptability of a novel, home-based, walking exercise behaviour-change intervention (MOtivating Structured walking Activity in people with Intermittent Claudication (MOSAIC)) in adults with Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD). Design and setting: Individual semi-structured audio-recorded interviews were conducted with adults with Peripheral Arterial Disease who had completed the MOSAIC intervention as part of a randomised clinical trial. Data were analysed using inductive reflexive thematic analysis and interpreted using the seven-construct theoretical framework of acceptability of healthcare interventions (TFA). Participants: Twenty participants (mean age (range) 67(54−80) years, 70% male, 55% White British) were interviewed. Results: One central theme was identified: Acceptability of walking exercise as a treatment. This theme was explained by four linked themes: Exploring walking exercise with a knowledgeable professional, Building confidence with each step, Towards self-management-learning strategies to continue walking and The impact of walking exercise. These themes were interpreted using six of the seven TFA constructs: affective attitude, burden, perceived effectiveness, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, and self-efficacy. Conclusions: Participants perceived MOSAIC as an effective, acceptable, and low burden intervention. Physiotherapists were regarded as knowledgeable and supportive professionals who helped participants understand PAD and walking exercise as a treatment. Participants developed confidence to self-manage their condition and their symptoms. As participants confidence and walking capacity improved, they expanded their activities and gained a more positive outlook on their future. MOSAIC is an acceptable intervention that may facilitate adoption of and access to exercise for people with PAD. Implications for practice: • The MOtivating Structured walking Activity in people with Intermittent Claudication (MOSAIC) intervention was perceived as an effective, low burden and acceptable intervention by participants. • Physiotherapists were regarded as knowledgeable and supportive professionals who helped participants understand PAD and walking exercise as a treatment. • MOSAIC helped participants improve their confidence to self-manage their condition and as their walking capacity improved participants expanded their activities and gained a more positive outlook on their future. • Implementation of MOSAIC may facilitate adoption of and access to exercise therapy for people with PAD.
AB - Objectives: This study explored the experiences and acceptability of a novel, home-based, walking exercise behaviour-change intervention (MOtivating Structured walking Activity in people with Intermittent Claudication (MOSAIC)) in adults with Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD). Design and setting: Individual semi-structured audio-recorded interviews were conducted with adults with Peripheral Arterial Disease who had completed the MOSAIC intervention as part of a randomised clinical trial. Data were analysed using inductive reflexive thematic analysis and interpreted using the seven-construct theoretical framework of acceptability of healthcare interventions (TFA). Participants: Twenty participants (mean age (range) 67(54−80) years, 70% male, 55% White British) were interviewed. Results: One central theme was identified: Acceptability of walking exercise as a treatment. This theme was explained by four linked themes: Exploring walking exercise with a knowledgeable professional, Building confidence with each step, Towards self-management-learning strategies to continue walking and The impact of walking exercise. These themes were interpreted using six of the seven TFA constructs: affective attitude, burden, perceived effectiveness, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, and self-efficacy. Conclusions: Participants perceived MOSAIC as an effective, acceptable, and low burden intervention. Physiotherapists were regarded as knowledgeable and supportive professionals who helped participants understand PAD and walking exercise as a treatment. Participants developed confidence to self-manage their condition and their symptoms. As participants confidence and walking capacity improved, they expanded their activities and gained a more positive outlook on their future. MOSAIC is an acceptable intervention that may facilitate adoption of and access to exercise for people with PAD. Implications for practice: • The MOtivating Structured walking Activity in people with Intermittent Claudication (MOSAIC) intervention was perceived as an effective, low burden and acceptable intervention by participants. • Physiotherapists were regarded as knowledgeable and supportive professionals who helped participants understand PAD and walking exercise as a treatment. • MOSAIC helped participants improve their confidence to self-manage their condition and as their walking capacity improved participants expanded their activities and gained a more positive outlook on their future. • Implementation of MOSAIC may facilitate adoption of and access to exercise therapy for people with PAD.
KW - Adult
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Aged
KW - Female
KW - Intermittent Claudication/therapy
KW - Exercise Therapy
KW - Walking
KW - Exercise
KW - Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183636141&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.physio.2023.09.002
DO - 10.1016/j.physio.2023.09.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 38266395
SN - 0031-9406
VL - 122
SP - 70
EP - 79
JO - PHYSIOTHERAPY
JF - PHYSIOTHERAPY
ER -