Participatory forest management: a route to poverty reduction?

TY - JOUR

T1 - Participatory forest management: a route to poverty reduction?

AU - Schreckenberg, K.

AU - Luttrell, C.

PY - 2009/6/1

Y1 - 2009/6/1

N2 - This paper presents the results of a three-year action research project, which investigated the impacts of participatory forest management (PFM) on poverty. Beginning with an analysis of over 30 cases reported in the literature, the project went on to undertake field research in Kenya, Tanzania and Nepal, three countries representing very different stages in and approaches to the implementation of PFM. PFM typically provides a new decision-making forum and may reroute previously direct household benefits to the user group or community level. Regardless of PFM model, the research shows that the key to providing rural people with a sustainable and equitably distributed stream of net benefits is to adopt poverty reduction as a stated objective, allow for both subsistence and commercial use of forest products, design appropriate PFM institutions, introduce transparent and equitable means of benefit-sharing, and provide sufficient support during establishment of PFM initiatives.

AB - This paper presents the results of a three-year action research project, which investigated the impacts of participatory forest management (PFM) on poverty. Beginning with an analysis of over 30 cases reported in the literature, the project went on to undertake field research in Kenya, Tanzania and Nepal, three countries representing very different stages in and approaches to the implementation of PFM. PFM typically provides a new decision-making forum and may reroute previously direct household benefits to the user group or community level. Regardless of PFM model, the research shows that the key to providing rural people with a sustainable and equitably distributed stream of net benefits is to adopt poverty reduction as a stated objective, allow for both subsistence and commercial use of forest products, design appropriate PFM institutions, introduce transparent and equitable means of benefit-sharing, and provide sufficient support during establishment of PFM initiatives.

KW - community forestry, livelihoods, equity, governance

UR - https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/76115/

U2 - 10.1505/ifor.11.2.221

DO - 10.1505/ifor.11.2.221

M3 - Article

SN - 1465-5489

VL - 11

SP - 221

EP - 238

JO - INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW

JF - INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW

IS - 2

ER -