Pathways to abstinence: Two-year follow-up data on 60 abstinent former opiate addicts who had been turned away from treatment

L Bacchus, J Strang, P Watson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Structural changes in the organization of drug treatment services in the northwest of England during the early 80s provided a unique opportunity to study a group of opiate addicts who were turned away from treatment. This paper reports on 60 opiate addicts who were abstinent at follow-up (2-3 years after their original referral). For the majority of subjects, any treatment received in the intervening period had been from a range of local, non-specialist treatment providers, including: general practices (n = 24) and local hospitals (n = 32). The subjects had also received assistance from non-statutory agencies (n = 35). Informal sources of support were drawn upon in the form of friends, family, and voluntary agencies. Social acceptance, legal problems, financial difficulties, and imprisonment were frequently cited as motivational factors that led to abstinence. At follow-up, improvements were reported in personal relationships and family circumstances, although there was less progress in relation to employment, finances, and housing. Increased involvement with the criminal justice system was significantly associated with a greater use of treatment services at follow-up. This paper presents the treatment and non-treat ment pathways that led to abstinence amongst this group of opiate addicts. It also points to the importance of including non-treatment samples in evaluations of treatment interventions. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141 - 147
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Addiction Research
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pathways to abstinence: Two-year follow-up data on 60 abstinent former opiate addicts who had been turned away from treatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this