Abstract
Peer review is an important stage in academic publishing, as a form of quality control to maintain the integrity of both the articles and the journals they appear in. However, the confidential nature of the relationship between reviewer and author does not necessarily benefit the system; with some reviewers using their anonymity to give unnecessary, injudicious comment. This paper explores the motives behind the reviewer's comments and how peer review could be improved by openness and honesty.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 153-154 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | British Dental Journal |
Volume | 213 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 25 Aug 2012 |