Plethysmograph and interrupter resistance measurements in prematurely born young children

M R Thomas, G F Rafferty, R Blowes, J L Peacock, N Marlow, S Calvert, A Milner, A Greenough

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)


Background: Airways obstruction in premature infants is often assessed by plethysmography, which requires sedation. The interrupter (Rint) technique does not require sedation, but has rarely been examined in children under 2 years of age. Objective: To compare Rint results with plethysmographic measurements of airway resistance (Raw) in prematurely born, young children. Design: Prospective study. Setting: Infant and Paediatric Lung Function Laboratories. Patients: Thirty children with a median gestational age of 25-29 weeks and median postnatal age of 13 months. Interventions and main outcome measures: The infants were sedated, airway resistance was measured by total body plethysmography (Raw), and Rint measurements were made using a MicroRint device. Further Raw and Rint measurements were made after salbutamol administration if the children remained asleep. Results: Baseline measurements of Raw and Rint were obtained from 30 and 26 respectively of the children. Mean baseline Rint values were higher than mean baseline Raw results (3.45 v 2.84 kPa/l/s, p = 0.006). Limits of agreement for the mean difference between Rint and Raw were -1.52 to 2.74 kPa/l/s. Ten infants received salbutomol, after which the mean Rint result was 3.6 kPa/l/s and mean Raw was 3.1 kPa/l/s (limits of agreement -0.28 to 1.44 kPa/l/s). Conclusion: The poor agreement between Rint and Raw results suggests that Rint measurements cannot substitute for plethysmographic measurements in sedated prematurely born infants
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)F193 - F196
JournalArchives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - May 2006


Dive into the research topics of 'Plethysmograph and interrupter resistance measurements in prematurely born young children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this