Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Andrea Mechelli, Diana Prata, Charles Kefford, Shitij Kapur
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 924-927 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 8 |
Early online date | 18 Mar 2015 |
DOIs | |
E-pub ahead of print | 18 Mar 2015 |
Published | 1 Aug 2015 |
Additional links |
People at ultra-high risk (UHR) of psychosis have ~30% chance of developing the illness within two years. A range of pharmacological and psychosocial interventions are now available but there is great individual variation in clinical response. Here we examine the evidence for clinically applicable predictors of clinical response in people at UHR of psychosis. We report that currently there are no reliable predictive markers that can be used to optimise treatment. We argue that there is an urgent need for a better understanding of why some people at UHR of psychosis benefit from a certain treatment whereas others do not. This information will help clinicians make more-effective treatment decisions, and improve long-term clinical outcomes in this population.
King's College London - Homepage
© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454