TY - JOUR
T1 - PREVIDE
T2 - A Qualitative Study to Develop a Decision-Making Framework (PREVention decIDE) for Noncommunicable Disease Prevention in Healthcare Organisations
AU - Canfell, Oliver J.
AU - Davidson, Kamila
AU - Sullivan, Clair
AU - Eakin, Elizabeth E.
AU - Burton-Jones, Andrew
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by The University of Queensland Business School Connect Grant Scheme. O.J.C. was funded by Digital Health Cooperative Research Centre (DHCRC), Australian Government (DHCRC-0083).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors.
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), including obesity, remain a significant global public health challenge. Prevention and public health innovation are needed to effectively address NCDs; however, understanding of how healthcare organisations make prevention decisions is immature. This study aimed to (1) explore how healthcare organisations make decisions for NCD prevention in Queensland, Australia (2) develop a contemporary decision-making framework to guide NCD prevention in healthcare organisations. Cross-sectional and qualitative design, comprising individual semi-structured interviews. Participants (n = 14) were recruited from two organisations: the state public health care system (CareQ) and health promotion/disease prevention agency (PrevQ). Participants held executive, director/manager or project/clinical lead roles. Data were analysed in two phases (1) automated content analysis using machine learning (Leximancer v4.5) (2) researcher-led interpretation of the text analytics. Final themes were consolidated into a proposed decision-making framework (PREVIDE, PREvention decIDE) for NCD prevention in healthcare organisations. Decision-making was driven by four themes: Data, Evidence, Ethics and Health, i.e., data, its quality and the story it tells; traditional and non-traditional sources of evidence; ethical grounding in fairness and equity; and long-term value generated across multiple determinants of health. The strength of evidence was directly proportional to confidence in the ethics of a decision. PREVIDE can be adapted by public health practitioners and policymakers to guide real-world policy, practice and investment decisions for obesity prevention and with further validation, other NCDs and priority settings (e.g., healthcare).
AB - Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), including obesity, remain a significant global public health challenge. Prevention and public health innovation are needed to effectively address NCDs; however, understanding of how healthcare organisations make prevention decisions is immature. This study aimed to (1) explore how healthcare organisations make decisions for NCD prevention in Queensland, Australia (2) develop a contemporary decision-making framework to guide NCD prevention in healthcare organisations. Cross-sectional and qualitative design, comprising individual semi-structured interviews. Participants (n = 14) were recruited from two organisations: the state public health care system (CareQ) and health promotion/disease prevention agency (PrevQ). Participants held executive, director/manager or project/clinical lead roles. Data were analysed in two phases (1) automated content analysis using machine learning (Leximancer v4.5) (2) researcher-led interpretation of the text analytics. Final themes were consolidated into a proposed decision-making framework (PREVIDE, PREvention decIDE) for NCD prevention in healthcare organisations. Decision-making was driven by four themes: Data, Evidence, Ethics and Health, i.e., data, its quality and the story it tells; traditional and non-traditional sources of evidence; ethical grounding in fairness and equity; and long-term value generated across multiple determinants of health. The strength of evidence was directly proportional to confidence in the ethics of a decision. PREVIDE can be adapted by public health practitioners and policymakers to guide real-world policy, practice and investment decisions for obesity prevention and with further validation, other NCDs and priority settings (e.g., healthcare).
KW - decision-making
KW - health policy
KW - noncommunicable diseases
KW - obesity
KW - precision public health
KW - preventive medicine
KW - public health
KW - public health informatics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142540955&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph192215285
DO - 10.3390/ijerph192215285
M3 - Article
C2 - 36430005
AN - SCOPUS:85142540955
SN - 1661-7827
VL - 19
JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
IS - 22
M1 - 15285
ER -