Price, cost and value of opiate detoxification treatments - Reanalysis of data from two randomised trials

TY - JOUR

T1 - Price, cost and value of opiate detoxification treatments - Reanalysis of data from two randomised trials

AU - Gossop, M

AU - Strang, J

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Background Treatments in different settings have different costs. A dilemma arises if expensive treatments lead to better outcomes. Aims To investigate conflicts between the priorities of cost minimisation, clinical effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness in the detoxification of opiate addicts. Method Cost and clinical effectiveness were examined using published outcome data. The main outcome measures were: achieving a drug-free state on completion of detoxification; the economic costs of treatment. Results In terms of simple cost, in-patient detoxification is much more expensive than out-patient treatment (ratio, 24:1). With adjustment for successful outcome, the costs are almost identical (ratio, 0.9:1). Comparison of specialist and general psychiatry in-patient settings showed that even when adjusted for clinical outcomes, the specialist setting is more costly (ratio, 1.9:1), although the outcomes are better. Conclusions Naive adherence to cost and cost-containment considerations is dangerous. Discussion of treatment costs is misleading if not informed by. and adjusted for, evidence of effectiveness. This is especially important where marked differences in outcome between treatment options exist. Declaration of interest Partial funding from the Medical Research Council.

AB - Background Treatments in different settings have different costs. A dilemma arises if expensive treatments lead to better outcomes. Aims To investigate conflicts between the priorities of cost minimisation, clinical effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness in the detoxification of opiate addicts. Method Cost and clinical effectiveness were examined using published outcome data. The main outcome measures were: achieving a drug-free state on completion of detoxification; the economic costs of treatment. Results In terms of simple cost, in-patient detoxification is much more expensive than out-patient treatment (ratio, 24:1). With adjustment for successful outcome, the costs are almost identical (ratio, 0.9:1). Comparison of specialist and general psychiatry in-patient settings showed that even when adjusted for clinical outcomes, the specialist setting is more costly (ratio, 1.9:1), although the outcomes are better. Conclusions Naive adherence to cost and cost-containment considerations is dangerous. Discussion of treatment costs is misleading if not informed by. and adjusted for, evidence of effectiveness. This is especially important where marked differences in outcome between treatment options exist. Declaration of interest Partial funding from the Medical Research Council.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033830253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1192/bjp.177.3.262

DO - 10.1192/bjp.177.3.262

M3 - Article

SN - 1472-1465

VL - 177

SP - 262

EP - 266

JO - British Journal of Psychiatry

JF - British Journal of Psychiatry

IS - SEPT

ER -