Abstract
We endow Brewka's prioritised default logic (PDL) with argumentation semantics using the ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation. We prove that the conclusions of the justified arguments correspond to the prioritised default extensions in a normatively rational manner. Argumentation semantics for PDL will allow for the application of argument game proof theories to the process of inference in PDL, making the reasons for accepting a conclusion transparent and the inference process more intuitive. This also opens up the possibility for argumentation-based distributed reasoning and communication amongst agents with PDL representations of mental attitudes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2016) |
Pages | 626-634 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Publication status | Published - 13 May 2016 |