TY - JOUR
T1 - Prohibit, Protect, or Adapt? The Changing Role of Volunteers in Palliative and Hospice Care Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic. A Multinational Survey (Covpall)
AU - CovPall study team
AU - Walshe, Catherine
AU - Garner, Ian
AU - Dunleavy, Lesley
AU - Preston, Nancy
AU - Bradshaw, Andy
AU - Cripps, Rachel L.
AU - Bajwah, Sabrina
AU - Sleeman, Katherine E.
AU - Hocaoglu, Mevhibe
AU - Maddocks, Matthew
AU - Murtagh, Fliss E.M.
AU - Oluyase, Adejoke O.
AU - Fraser, Lorna K.
AU - Higginson, Irene J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by UKRI and the NIHR [COV0011; MR/ V012908/1]. Additional support was from the NIHR, ARC, SL, hosted at King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, and Cicely Saunders International (Registered Charity No. 1087195).
Funding Information:
This study was part of CovPall, a multi-national study, supported by the Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South London (SL) and Cicely Saunders International. We thank all collaborators and advisors. We thank all participants, partners, PPI members and our Study Steering Group. We gratefully acknowledge technical assistance from the Precision Health Informatics Data Lab group (https:// phidatalab.org) at NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at SL and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London for the use of REDCap for data capture.
Funding Information:
IJH is the grant holder and chief investigator; KES, MM, FEM, CW, NP, LKF, SB, MBH, and AO are co-applicants for funding. IJH and CW with critical input from all authors wrote the protocol for the CovPall study. MBH, AO, RC, and LD co-ordinated data collection and liaised with centres, with input from IJH, FEM, CW, NP, and LKF. IG, MH, AO, LF, and CW analysed the data. All authors had access to all study data, discussed the interpretation of findings and take responsibility for data integrity and analysis. CW and IF drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to the analysis plan and provided critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by UKRI and the NIHR [COV0011; MR/ V012908/1]. Additional support was from the NIHR, ARC, SL, hosted at King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, and Cicely Saunders International (Registered Charity No. 1087195). IJH is a NIHR Emeritus Senior Investigator and is supported by the NIHR ARC SL at King’s College Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust. IJH leads the Palliative and End of Life Care theme of the NIHR ARC SL and co-leads the national theme in this. CW is supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (ARC NWC, NIHR200182). MM is funded by a NIHR Career Development Fellowship (CDF-2017-10-009) and NIHR ARC SL. LKF is funded by a NIHR Career Development Fellowship (award CDF-2018-11-ST2-002). KES is funded by a NIHR Clinician Scientist Fellowship (CS-2015-15-005). RC is funded by Cicely Saunders International. FEM is a NIHR Senior Investigator. MBH is supported by the NIHR ARC SL. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences.
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Background: Volunteers are common within palliative care services, and provide support that enhances care quality. The support they provided, and any role changes, during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are unknown. The aim of this study is to understand volunteer deployment and activities within palliative care services, and to identify what may affect any changes in volunteer service provision, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Multi-national online survey disseminated via key stakeholders to specialist palliative care services, completed by lead clinicians. Data collected on volunteer roles, deployment, and changes in volunteer engagement. Analysis included descriptive statistics, a multivariable logistic regression, and analysis of free-text comments using a content analysis approach. Results: 458 respondents: 277 UK, 85 rest of Europe, and 95 rest of the world. 68.5% indicated volunteer use pre-COVID-19 across a number of roles (from 458): direct patient facing support (58.7%), indirect support (52.0%), back office (48.5%) and fundraising (45.6%). 11% had volunteers with COVID-19. Of those responding to a question on change in volunteer deployment (328 of 458) most (256/328, 78%) indicated less or much less use of volunteers. Less use of volunteers was associated with being an in-patient hospice, (odds ratio [OR] = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.07-0.3, P < .001). This reduction in volunteers was felt to protect potentially vulnerable volunteers, with policy changes preventing volunteer support. However, adapting was also seen where new roles were created, or existing roles pivoted to provide virtual support. Conclusion: Volunteers were mostly prevented from supporting many forms of palliative care which may have quality and safety implications given their previously central roles. Volunteer re-deployment plans are needed that take a more considered approach, using volunteers more flexibly to enhance care while ensuring safe working practices. Consideration needs to be given to widening the volunteer base away from those who may be considered to be most vulnerable to COVID-19.
AB - Background: Volunteers are common within palliative care services, and provide support that enhances care quality. The support they provided, and any role changes, during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are unknown. The aim of this study is to understand volunteer deployment and activities within palliative care services, and to identify what may affect any changes in volunteer service provision, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Multi-national online survey disseminated via key stakeholders to specialist palliative care services, completed by lead clinicians. Data collected on volunteer roles, deployment, and changes in volunteer engagement. Analysis included descriptive statistics, a multivariable logistic regression, and analysis of free-text comments using a content analysis approach. Results: 458 respondents: 277 UK, 85 rest of Europe, and 95 rest of the world. 68.5% indicated volunteer use pre-COVID-19 across a number of roles (from 458): direct patient facing support (58.7%), indirect support (52.0%), back office (48.5%) and fundraising (45.6%). 11% had volunteers with COVID-19. Of those responding to a question on change in volunteer deployment (328 of 458) most (256/328, 78%) indicated less or much less use of volunteers. Less use of volunteers was associated with being an in-patient hospice, (odds ratio [OR] = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.07-0.3, P < .001). This reduction in volunteers was felt to protect potentially vulnerable volunteers, with policy changes preventing volunteer support. However, adapting was also seen where new roles were created, or existing roles pivoted to provide virtual support. Conclusion: Volunteers were mostly prevented from supporting many forms of palliative care which may have quality and safety implications given their previously central roles. Volunteer re-deployment plans are needed that take a more considered approach, using volunteers more flexibly to enhance care while ensuring safe working practices. Consideration needs to be given to widening the volunteer base away from those who may be considered to be most vulnerable to COVID-19.
KW - COVID-19
KW - Palliative Care
KW - Volunteers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122131654&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.128
DO - 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.128
M3 - Article
C2 - 34664497
AN - SCOPUS:85122131654
SN - 2322-5939
VL - 11
SP - 2146
EP - 2154
JO - International Journal of Health Policy and Management
JF - International Journal of Health Policy and Management
IS - 10
ER -