TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychometric properties of the Affective Lability Scale (54 and 18-item version) in patients with bipolar disorder, first-degree relatives, and healthy controls
AU - Aas, Monica
AU - Pedersen, Geir
AU - Henry, Chantal
AU - Bjella, Thomas
AU - Bellivier, Frank
AU - Leboyer, Marion
AU - Kahn, Jean Pierre
AU - Cohen, Renaud F.
AU - Gard, Sebastien
AU - Aminoff, Sofie R.
AU - Lagerberg, Trine V.
AU - Andreassen, Ole A.
AU - Melle, Ingrid
AU - Etain, Bruno
N1 - Funding Information:
France: This work was supported by INSERM (C0829), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (P111002), ENBREC (European Network of Bipolar Research Expert Centre) (FP7-Health 223102), RTRS Santé Mentale (Fondation Fondamental) and LABEX BioPsy (ANR-11-IDEX-0004-02), Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR) (MANAGE_BD), Fondation pour la Recherche sur le Cerveau (FRC) and National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (NARSAD) . These organizations had no role in the design of the study, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, the writing of the report and in the decision to submit the paper for publication. Norway: This study was funded by grants from the University of Oslo, South-Eastern Norway Health Authority ( #2013123 , #2006258 ), the Research Council of Norway ( #213837 , #223273 , #190311/V50 ) and the KG Jebsen Foundation .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/2/1
Y1 - 2015/2/1
N2 - Introduction The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the original 54 item version (ALS-54) and the short 18 item version (ALS-18) of the Affective Lability Scale (ALS) in patients with bipolar disorders, their first-degree relatives and healthy controls. Internal Consistency and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were performed, comparing clinical and non-clinical group comparisons on ALS scores. Methods A total of 993 participants (patients with bipolar disorders [n=422], first-degree relatives [n=201] and controls [n=370]) were recruited from France and Norway. Diagnosis and clinical characteristics were assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders (SCID-I), or the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS). Affective lability was measured using the ALS-54 and ALS-18. Results Both ALS-54 and ALS-18 showed high internal consistency, but the subdimensions of both versions were highly inter-correlated. From confirmatory factor analysis both versions revealed acceptable to good model fit. Patients had significantly higher ALS scores compared to controls, with affected first-degree relatives presenting intermediate scores. Conclusion Both the original ALS-54 version and the short ALS-18 version showed good psychometric properties. They also discriminated between patients with a bipolar disorder (high ALS), first degree relatives (intermediate ALS), and healthy controls (low ALS). A high correlation between ALS items for both versions was observed. Our study supports reducing the scale from 54 to 18 items.
AB - Introduction The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the original 54 item version (ALS-54) and the short 18 item version (ALS-18) of the Affective Lability Scale (ALS) in patients with bipolar disorders, their first-degree relatives and healthy controls. Internal Consistency and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were performed, comparing clinical and non-clinical group comparisons on ALS scores. Methods A total of 993 participants (patients with bipolar disorders [n=422], first-degree relatives [n=201] and controls [n=370]) were recruited from France and Norway. Diagnosis and clinical characteristics were assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders (SCID-I), or the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS). Affective lability was measured using the ALS-54 and ALS-18. Results Both ALS-54 and ALS-18 showed high internal consistency, but the subdimensions of both versions were highly inter-correlated. From confirmatory factor analysis both versions revealed acceptable to good model fit. Patients had significantly higher ALS scores compared to controls, with affected first-degree relatives presenting intermediate scores. Conclusion Both the original ALS-54 version and the short ALS-18 version showed good psychometric properties. They also discriminated between patients with a bipolar disorder (high ALS), first degree relatives (intermediate ALS), and healthy controls (low ALS). A high correlation between ALS items for both versions was observed. Our study supports reducing the scale from 54 to 18 items.
KW - ALS original 54 item version (ALS-54)
KW - ALS short 18 item version (ALS-18)
KW - Bipolar disorders
KW - First-degree relatives
KW - Healthy controls
KW - Psychometric properties
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84913572982&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.028
DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.028
M3 - Article
C2 - 25451440
AN - SCOPUS:84913572982
SN - 0165-0327
VL - 172
SP - 375
EP - 380
JO - Journal of Affective Disorders
JF - Journal of Affective Disorders
ER -