King's College London

Research portal

Public attitudes in England towards the sharing of personal data following a mass casualty incident: a cross-sectional study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Public attitudes in England towards the sharing of personal data following a mass casualty incident : a cross-sectional study. / Rubin, G James; Webster, Rebecca K.; Rubin, Antonia N; Amlôt, Richard; Grey, Nick ; Greenberg, Neil.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 8, No. 5, 20.05.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Rubin, GJ, Webster, RK, Rubin, AN, Amlôt, R, Grey, N & Greenberg, N 2018, 'Public attitudes in England towards the sharing of personal data following a mass casualty incident: a cross-sectional study', BMJ Open, vol. 8, no. 5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022852

APA

Rubin, G. J., Webster, R. K., Rubin, A. N., Amlôt, R., Grey, N., & Greenberg, N. (2018). Public attitudes in England towards the sharing of personal data following a mass casualty incident: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022852

Vancouver

Rubin GJ, Webster RK, Rubin AN, Amlôt R, Grey N, Greenberg N. Public attitudes in England towards the sharing of personal data following a mass casualty incident: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018 May 20;8(5). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022852

Author

Rubin, G James ; Webster, Rebecca K. ; Rubin, Antonia N ; Amlôt, Richard ; Grey, Nick ; Greenberg, Neil. / Public attitudes in England towards the sharing of personal data following a mass casualty incident : a cross-sectional study. In: BMJ Open. 2018 ; Vol. 8, No. 5.

Bibtex Download

@article{ccfb0fa7bdf34d4291af16fda498ffb6,
title = "Public attitudes in England towards the sharing of personal data following a mass casualty incident: a cross-sectional study",
abstract = "Objectives To assess public attitudes towards data sharing to facilitate a mental health screening programme for people caught up in a mass casualty incident.Design Two, identical, cross-sectional, online surveys, using quotas to ensure demographic representativeness of people aged 18–65 years in England. Participants were randomly allocated to consider a scenario in which they witness a terrorism-related radiation incident or mass shooting, after which a police officer records their contact details.Setting Participants were drawn from an online panel maintained by a market research company. Surveys were conducted before and immediately after a series of terrorist attacks and a large tower block fire occurred in England.Participants One thousand people aged 18–65 years participated in each survey.Main outcome measures Three questions asking participants if it would be acceptable for police to share their contact details, without asking first, with {\textquoteleft}a health-related government organisation, so they can send you a questionnaire to find out if you might benefit from extra care or support{\textquoteright}, {\textquoteleft}a specialist NHS team, to provide you with information about ways to get support for any physical or mental health issues{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}your GP, so they can check how you are doing{\textquoteright}.Results A minority of participants reported that it would be definitely not acceptable for their details to be shared with the government organisation (n=259, 13.0%), the National Health Service (NHS) (n=141, 7.1%) and their general practitioner (GP) (n=166, 8.3%). There was a small, but significant increase in acceptability for the radiation incident compared with the mass shooting. No major differences were observed between the preincident and postincident surveys.Conclusions Although most people believe it is acceptable for their details to be shared in order to facilitate a mental health response to a major incident, care must be taken to communicate with those affected about how their information will be used.",
author = "Rubin, {G James} and Webster, {Rebecca K.} and Rubin, {Antonia N} and Richard Aml{\^o}t and Nick Grey and Neil Greenberg",
year = "2018",
month = may,
day = "20",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022852",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "5",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public attitudes in England towards the sharing of personal data following a mass casualty incident

T2 - a cross-sectional study

AU - Rubin, G James

AU - Webster, Rebecca K.

AU - Rubin, Antonia N

AU - Amlôt, Richard

AU - Grey, Nick

AU - Greenberg, Neil

PY - 2018/5/20

Y1 - 2018/5/20

N2 - Objectives To assess public attitudes towards data sharing to facilitate a mental health screening programme for people caught up in a mass casualty incident.Design Two, identical, cross-sectional, online surveys, using quotas to ensure demographic representativeness of people aged 18–65 years in England. Participants were randomly allocated to consider a scenario in which they witness a terrorism-related radiation incident or mass shooting, after which a police officer records their contact details.Setting Participants were drawn from an online panel maintained by a market research company. Surveys were conducted before and immediately after a series of terrorist attacks and a large tower block fire occurred in England.Participants One thousand people aged 18–65 years participated in each survey.Main outcome measures Three questions asking participants if it would be acceptable for police to share their contact details, without asking first, with ‘a health-related government organisation, so they can send you a questionnaire to find out if you might benefit from extra care or support’, ‘a specialist NHS team, to provide you with information about ways to get support for any physical or mental health issues’ and ‘your GP, so they can check how you are doing’.Results A minority of participants reported that it would be definitely not acceptable for their details to be shared with the government organisation (n=259, 13.0%), the National Health Service (NHS) (n=141, 7.1%) and their general practitioner (GP) (n=166, 8.3%). There was a small, but significant increase in acceptability for the radiation incident compared with the mass shooting. No major differences were observed between the preincident and postincident surveys.Conclusions Although most people believe it is acceptable for their details to be shared in order to facilitate a mental health response to a major incident, care must be taken to communicate with those affected about how their information will be used.

AB - Objectives To assess public attitudes towards data sharing to facilitate a mental health screening programme for people caught up in a mass casualty incident.Design Two, identical, cross-sectional, online surveys, using quotas to ensure demographic representativeness of people aged 18–65 years in England. Participants were randomly allocated to consider a scenario in which they witness a terrorism-related radiation incident or mass shooting, after which a police officer records their contact details.Setting Participants were drawn from an online panel maintained by a market research company. Surveys were conducted before and immediately after a series of terrorist attacks and a large tower block fire occurred in England.Participants One thousand people aged 18–65 years participated in each survey.Main outcome measures Three questions asking participants if it would be acceptable for police to share their contact details, without asking first, with ‘a health-related government organisation, so they can send you a questionnaire to find out if you might benefit from extra care or support’, ‘a specialist NHS team, to provide you with information about ways to get support for any physical or mental health issues’ and ‘your GP, so they can check how you are doing’.Results A minority of participants reported that it would be definitely not acceptable for their details to be shared with the government organisation (n=259, 13.0%), the National Health Service (NHS) (n=141, 7.1%) and their general practitioner (GP) (n=166, 8.3%). There was a small, but significant increase in acceptability for the radiation incident compared with the mass shooting. No major differences were observed between the preincident and postincident surveys.Conclusions Although most people believe it is acceptable for their details to be shared in order to facilitate a mental health response to a major incident, care must be taken to communicate with those affected about how their information will be used.

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022852

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022852

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 5

ER -

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454