King's College London

Research portal

Public Trust and Trustworthiness in Biobanking: The Need for More Reflexivity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Gabrielle Samuel, Broekstra,, Felix Gille, Anneke Lucassen

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)291-296
Number of pages6
JournalBiopreservation And Biobanking
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
Published1 Jun 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information: This study was supported by Wellcome under Grant No. 219629/Z/19/Z and the Digital Society Initiative, University of Zurich. As required by this funder, the author will apply a CC BY public copyright license to any author accepted article version arising from this submission. Publisher Copyright: © 2022, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.

Documents

  • Trust and biobanking

    Final_B_and_B_trust_paper_14th_Sept.docx, 44.8 KB, application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document

    Uploaded date:21 Feb 2022

King's Authors

Abstract

Low levels of public trust in biobanks are perceived to be a deterrent to participation and a threat to their sustainability. Acting in a “trustworthy” manner is seen to be one approach to ensuring public trust in biobanks. Striving to improve public trust in biobanks and prioritizing the need for institutional trustworthiness are both vital endeavors. However, there has been little discussion in the context of biobanking about the meaning of these two concepts, and the relationship between them. In this article, we argue that it is important to examine this, to ensure clarity around their meaning, as well as their relationship with each other as they apply to biobanking. We conclude by making a series of recommendations for biobanks.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454