QoS Conflict Resolution in Ad Hoc Networks

Ronan de Renesse; Piyush Khengar; Vasilis Friderikos; Abdol-Hamid Aghvami

doi:10.1109/ICC.2006.255668

QoS Conflict Resolution in Ad Hoc Networks

Ronan de Renesse, Piyush Khengar, Vasilis Friderikos, Abdol-Hamid Aghvami

King's College London

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference paper

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Providing Quality of Service in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANET) is a challenging task due to the unreliability of the wireless medium and mobility. QoS routing is used to find QoS available paths that map QoS requirements, based on network information acquired during the route discovery process, and/or using periodic monitoring. If the QoS demand goes beyond the network capacity, the call admission procedure generally rejects any incoming QoS request, thus, avoiding quality deterioration of existing QoS flows. However, channel conditions are likely to change and might threaten the QoS provision at any time. Therefore, a strategy is needed to reinstate QoS guarantees when at risk. Whenever Best-Effort traffic deterioration is not applicable or useless, a QoS flow has to be sacrificed for the sake of others. The selection of the victim QoS flow expresses a need for conflict resolution policies. This paper proposes and analyses different conflict resolution policies and their impact on QoS provision in Ad Hoc networks.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Istanbul, Volume 8, June 2006
Place of Publication	NEW YORK
Publisher	IEEE
Pages	3826 - 3831
Number of pages	6
Volume	8
ISBN (Print)	978-1-4244-0354-7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2006.255668
Publication status	Published - 2006
Event	IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC 2006) - Istanbul, Turkey Duration: 11 Jun 2006 → 15 Jun 2006

Publication series

Name	2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS, VOLS 1-12

Conference

Conference	IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC 2006)
Country/Territory	Turkey
City	Istanbul
Period	11/06/2006 → 15/06/2006

Access to Document

10.1109/ICC.2006.255668

Cite this

@inbook{17b4dc2917b94cd9b519cda1ed5588f1,

title = "QoS Conflict Resolution in Ad Hoc Networks",

abstract = "Providing Quality of Service in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANET) is a challenging task due to the unreliability of the wireless medium and mobility. QoS routing is used to find QoS available paths that map QoS requirements, based on network information acquired during the route discovery process, and/or using periodic monitoring. If the QoS demand goes beyond the network capacity, the call admission procedure generally rejects any incoming QoS request, thus, avoiding quality deterioration of existing QoS flows. However, channel conditions are likely to change and might threaten the QoS provision at any time. Therefore, a strategy is needed to reinstate QoS guarantees when at risk. Whenever Best-Effort traffic deterioration is not applicable or useless, a QoS flow has to be sacrificed for the sake of others. The selection of the victim QoS flow expresses a need for conflict resolution policies. This paper proposes and analyses different conflict resolution policies and their impact on QoS provision in Ad Hoc networks.",

author = "{de Renesse}, Ronan and Piyush Khengar and Vasilis Friderikos and Abdol-Hamid Aghvami",

year = "2006",

doi = "10.1109/ICC.2006.255668",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-1-4244-0354-7",

volume = "8",

series = "2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS, VOLS 1-12",

publisher = "IEEE",

pages = "3826 -- 3831",

booktitle = "IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Istanbul, Volume 8, June 2006",

note = "IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC 2006) ; Conference date: 11-06-2006 Through 15-06-2006",

}

de Renesse, R, Khengar, P , Friderikos, V & Aghvami, A-H 2006, QoS Conflict Resolution in Ad Hoc Networks. in IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Istanbul, Volume 8, June 2006. vol. 8, 2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS, VOLS 1-12, IEEE, NEW YORK, pp. 3826 - 3831, IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC 2006), Istanbul, Turkey, 11/06/2006. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2006.255668

QoS Conflict Resolution in Ad Hoc Networks. / de Renesse, Ronan; Khengar, Piyush ; Friderikos, Vasilis et al.
IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Istanbul, Volume 8, June 2006. Vol. 8 NEW YORK: IEEE, 2006. p. 3826 - 3831 (2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS, VOLS 1-12).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference paper

TY - CHAP

T1 - QoS Conflict Resolution in Ad Hoc Networks

AU - de Renesse, Ronan

AU - Khengar, Piyush

AU - Friderikos, Vasilis

AU - Aghvami, Abdol-Hamid

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Providing Quality of Service in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANET) is a challenging task due to the unreliability of the wireless medium and mobility. QoS routing is used to find QoS available paths that map QoS requirements, based on network information acquired during the route discovery process, and/or using periodic monitoring. If the QoS demand goes beyond the network capacity, the call admission procedure generally rejects any incoming QoS request, thus, avoiding quality deterioration of existing QoS flows. However, channel conditions are likely to change and might threaten the QoS provision at any time. Therefore, a strategy is needed to reinstate QoS guarantees when at risk. Whenever Best-Effort traffic deterioration is not applicable or useless, a QoS flow has to be sacrificed for the sake of others. The selection of the victim QoS flow expresses a need for conflict resolution policies. This paper proposes and analyses different conflict resolution policies and their impact on QoS provision in Ad Hoc networks.

AB - Providing Quality of Service in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANET) is a challenging task due to the unreliability of the wireless medium and mobility. QoS routing is used to find QoS available paths that map QoS requirements, based on network information acquired during the route discovery process, and/or using periodic monitoring. If the QoS demand goes beyond the network capacity, the call admission procedure generally rejects any incoming QoS request, thus, avoiding quality deterioration of existing QoS flows. However, channel conditions are likely to change and might threaten the QoS provision at any time. Therefore, a strategy is needed to reinstate QoS guarantees when at risk. Whenever Best-Effort traffic deterioration is not applicable or useless, a QoS flow has to be sacrificed for the sake of others. The selection of the victim QoS flow expresses a need for conflict resolution policies. This paper proposes and analyses different conflict resolution policies and their impact on QoS provision in Ad Hoc networks.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42549119079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/ICC.2006.255668

DO - 10.1109/ICC.2006.255668

M3 - Conference paper

SN - 978-1-4244-0354-7

VL - 8

T3 - 2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS, VOLS 1-12

SP - 3826

EP - 3831

BT - IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Istanbul, Volume 8, June 2006

PB - IEEE

CY - NEW YORK

T2 - IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC 2006)

Y2 - 11 June 2006 through 15 June 2006

ER -

QoS Conflict Resolution in Ad Hoc Networks

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this