Quality of stepped-wedge trial reporting can be reliably assessed using an updated CONSORT: crowd-sourcing systematic review

  • The SW-CRT Review Group
  • , Karla Hemming*
  • , Kelly Carroll
  • , Jennifer Thompson
  • , Andrew Forbes
  • , Monica Taljaard
  • , Susan J. Dutton
  • , Vichithranie Madurasinghe
  • , Katy Morgan
  • , Beth Stuart
  • , Katherine Fielding
  • , Victoria Cornelius
  • , Elizabeth L. Turner
  • , Richard Hooper
  • , Bruno Giraudeau
  • , Paul T. Seed
  • , Alecia Nickless
  • , Michael Grayling
  • , Melanie Prague
  • , Sally Kerry
    • Lauren Bell, Eila Watson, Rafael Gafoor, Nadine Marlin, Emel Yorganci, Lesley Smith, Murielle Mbekwe, Steven Teerenstra, Claire Chan, Mirjam Moerbeek, Pamela Jacobsen, Simon Bond, Ben Jones, John Preisser, Mona Kanaan, Catherine Hewitt, Christina Easter, Tracy Pellatt-Higgins, Laura Pankhurst, Schadrac C. Agbla, Sandra Eldridge, Robin G. Lerner, Clémence Leyrat, Mark Pilling, Julia R. Forman, Indrani Bhattacharya, Nicholas Magill, Jane Candlish, Cliona McDowell, James Martin, Caroline Kristunas
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)
190 Downloads (Pure)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quality of stepped-wedge trial reporting can be reliably assessed using an updated CONSORT: crowd-sourcing systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by

Psychology

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science