Abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), whereby subjects are randomly assigned to different conditions and outcomes are compared afterward, have become a very popular method in political science because they offer the possibility of causal inference that is so hard to achieve otherwise. But the method attracts strong criticism, often made from outside political science. It is claimed that trials have poor realism, weak external validity, allow for only a limited range of possible research topics, and throw up unique ethical challenges. While political scientists should take good note of these criticisms when they design trials, they also need to be aware that these kinds of challenges are also faced by social scientists generally. All scholars need to be aware of the limits of the methods they use, which include randomized controlled trials.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Political Science |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Pages | 343-354 |
Number of pages | 12 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780197519837 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780197519806 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2023 |
Keywords
- experiments in political science
- field experiments
- political methodology
- randomized controlled trials (RCTs)