Rapid response systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ritesh Maharaj*, Ivan Raffaele, Julia Wendon

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    379 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Introduction: Although rapid response system teams have been widely adopted by many health systems, their effectiveness in reducing hospital mortality is uncertain. We conducted a meta-analysis to examine the impact of rapid response teams on hospital mortality and cardiopulmonary arrest. Method: We conducted a systematic review of studies published from January 1, 1990, through 31 December 2013, using PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) and the Cochrane Library. We included studies that reported data on the primary outcomes of ICU and in-hospital mortality or cardiopulmonary arrests. Results: Twenty-nine eligible studies were identified. The studies were analysed in groups based on adult and paediatric trials that were further sub-grouped on methodological design. There were 5 studies that were considered either cluster randomized control trial, controlled before after or interrupted time series. The remaining studies were before and after studies without a contemporaneous control. The implementation of RRS has been associated with an overall reduction in hospital mortality in both the adult (RR 0.87, 95 % CI 0.81-0.95, p

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number254
    JournalCRITICAL CARE
    Volume19
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 12 Jun 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Rapid response systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this