TY - CHAP
T1 - Reaction and Adaptation in the Longue Durée: The Far-Right, International Politics and the State in Historical Perspective
AU - Chryssogelos, Angelos
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - This chapter will explore the question of how the European far-right, the heir of a backward-looking ideological tradition, has managed to survive for a period straddling three centuries, currently forming a permanent fixture of European politics. This persistence is all the more impressive if one considers the twin but conflicting imperatives the far-right has struggled with in its historical trajectory: the imperative to maintain a profile of opposition to secular social and political progress – what I will call the reaction imperative; and the imperative to keep a parochial critique relevant by engaging with the constant evolution of the dominant ideas attached to political and economic rule – what I will call the modernisation imperative. These conflicting imperatives normally should have hindered the development and survival of the far-right, but its persistence suggests that it has juggled them with success. What has made this success possible? Following the focus of this volume, I will treat this question by emphasizing two aspects in the study of the far-right: First, as is the case with most contributions here, I will employ a longue durée historical perspective of the far-right’s evolution. Second, I will focus on the role of the ‘international as constitutive of the identity and orientation of the far right’ at various points in time, particularly because I share with the contributors of this volume the idea that the international forms an important asset of the far-right, being framed invariably as ‘fear, hostility and opportunity’.
AB - This chapter will explore the question of how the European far-right, the heir of a backward-looking ideological tradition, has managed to survive for a period straddling three centuries, currently forming a permanent fixture of European politics. This persistence is all the more impressive if one considers the twin but conflicting imperatives the far-right has struggled with in its historical trajectory: the imperative to maintain a profile of opposition to secular social and political progress – what I will call the reaction imperative; and the imperative to keep a parochial critique relevant by engaging with the constant evolution of the dominant ideas attached to political and economic rule – what I will call the modernisation imperative. These conflicting imperatives normally should have hindered the development and survival of the far-right, but its persistence suggests that it has juggled them with success. What has made this success possible? Following the focus of this volume, I will treat this question by emphasizing two aspects in the study of the far-right: First, as is the case with most contributions here, I will employ a longue durée historical perspective of the far-right’s evolution. Second, I will focus on the role of the ‘international as constitutive of the identity and orientation of the far right’ at various points in time, particularly because I share with the contributors of this volume the idea that the international forms an important asset of the far-right, being framed invariably as ‘fear, hostility and opportunity’.
M3 - Chapter
SN - 9781138785748
T3 - Routledge Studies in Modern History
SP - 85
EP - 105
BT - The Longue Durée of the Far-Right: An International Historical Sociology
A2 - Saull, Richard
A2 - Anievas, Alexander
A2 - Davidson, Neil
A2 - Fabry, Adam
PB - Routlege
CY - Abingdon and New York
ER -