Reasons for Not Adopting COVID-19 Permitted Changes to Legal Duties: Accounts from English Local Authorities

Mary Baginsky*, Emily Thomas, Jill Manthorpe

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In England, “easements,” introduced via the Coronavirus Act 2020, were brought in at the start of the pandemic to support English local authority adult social care services. They enabled local authorities to suspend some of their mandatory duties under the Care Act 2014. Easements were only adopted by eight local authorities and for short periods, and the provision was rescinded in late 2021. This article examines why a sample of 16 local authorities, some of which were statistically close to the eight local authorities that did decide to use easements, decided not to do so. It draws on data from interviews undertaken in 2021 with Directors of Adult Services and Principal Social Workers that explored their decision-making about using easements. It also outlines their preparations prior to the pandemic reaching England, how they had operated using “flexibilities” within the Care Act thus not needing to adopt easements, and their views on those authorities that had adopted them.
Original languageEnglish
Article number8447118
Number of pages7
JournalHealth & social care in the community
Early online date1 Jun 2023
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 1 Jun 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reasons for Not Adopting COVID-19 Permitted Changes to Legal Duties: Accounts from English Local Authorities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this