Recommended conventions for reporting results from direct dark matter searches

D. Baxter, I. M. Bloch, E. Bodnia, X. Chen, J. Conrad, P. Di Gangi, J. E.Y. Dobson, D. Durnford, S. J. Haselschwardt, A. Kaboth, R. F. Lang, Q. Lin, W. H. Lippincott*, J. Liu, A. Manalaysay, C. McCabe, K. D. Morå, D. Naim, R. Neilson, I. OlcinaM. C. Piro, M. Selvi, B. von Krosigk, S. Westerdale, Y. Yang, N. Zhou

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The field of dark matter detection is a highly visible and highly competitive one. In this paper, we propose recommendations for presenting dark matter direct detection results particularly suited for weak-scale dark matter searches, although we believe the spirit of the recommendations can apply more broadly to searches for other dark matter candidates, such as very light dark matter or axions. To translate experimental data into a final published result, direct detection collaborations must make a series of choices in their analysis, ranging from how to model astrophysical parameters to how to make statistical inferences based on observed data. While many collaborations follow a standard set of recommendations in some areas, for example the expected flux of dark matter particles (to a large degree based on a paper from Lewin and Smith in 1995), in other areas, particularly in statistical inference, they have taken different approaches, often from result to result by the same collaboration. We set out a number of recommendations on how to apply the now commonly used Profile Likelihood Ratio method to direct detection data. In addition, updated recommendations for the Standard Halo Model astrophysical parameters and relevant neutrino fluxes are provided. The authors of this note include members of the DAMIC, DarkSide, DARWIN, DEAP, LZ, NEWS-G, PandaX, PICO, SBC, SENSEI, SuperCDMS, and XENON collaborations, and these collaborations provided input to the recommendations laid out here. Wide-spread adoption of these recommendations will make it easier to compare and combine future dark matter results.

Original languageEnglish
Article number907
JournalEuropean Physical Journal C
Volume81
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recommended conventions for reporting results from direct dark matter searches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this