Redefining 'Tradition' in Political Thought

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)
694 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Debates about preserving, modifying and applying sharia (Islamic normative guidelines) through principles of taqlid (to follow) or ijtihad (to carry out independent interpretation) are immensely useful in thinking through a sharper definition of tradition for political theorists and historians of political thought more generally. Political theorists and historians of political thought have tended to use tradition in a range of ways without specifying key elements of the concept. Building on debates in Islamic thought related to taqlid and its relationship to ijtihad, and through a focus on the ideas of a contemporary thinker, Javed Ahmed Ghamidi, this paper proposes that tradition in political thought can be defined as a framework for knowledge production and consumption constituted of two key elements: method and sensibility. Further, the paper suggests that this definition allows us a better understanding of vibrancy in a tradition: vehement debate, contradictions and internal contestation are not signs of decay but of vitality within a tradition. It is the severe delinking of the two elements of a tradition, method and sensibility, which has greater potential to reduce its vibrancy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)424-444
JournalEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL THEORY
Volume15
Issue number4
Early online date16 Sept 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2016

Keywords

  • Islamic political thought; Taqlid; Ghamidi' Comparative Political Theory; South Asian Thought

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Redefining 'Tradition' in Political Thought'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this