King's College London

Research portal

Refractory depression – Cost-Effectiveness of Radically Open Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (RefraMED): findings of trial-based economic evaluation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

James Douglas Shearer, Tom Lynch, R Chamba, Clarke Sue, Roelie Hempel, David Kingdon, Heather O'Mahen, B. Remington, S Rushbrook, I. T. Russell, M Stanton, M. Swales, A. Watkins, B. Whalley, Sarah Byford

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages25
JournalBJPsych Open
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 7 Jul 2019

Documents

King's Authors

Abstract

Background
Refractory depression is a major contributor to the economic burden of depression. Radically Open Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (RO DBT) is an unevaluated new treatment targeting over-controlled personality, common in refractory depression, but it is not yet known whether the additional expense of RO DBT is good value for money.
Aim
To estimate the cost-effectiveness of RO DBT plus treatment as usual (TAU) compared with TAU alone in patients with refractory depression.
Methods
We undertook a cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomised trial evaluating RO DBT plus TAU versus TAU alone for refractory depression in three UK secondary care centres. Our economic evaluation, 12 months after randomisation, adopted the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services. It evaluated cost-effectiveness by comparing the net cost of RO DBT with the net gain in quality-adjusted life years, estimated using the EQ-5D-3L measure of health-related quality of life.
Results
The additional cost of RO DBT plus TAU compared to TAU alone was £7,048, which was associated with a difference of 0.032 QALYs, yielding an ICER of £220,250 per QALY. This ICER was well above the NICE upper threshold of £30,000 per QALY. A cost-effectiveness acceptability curve indicated that RO DBT had a zero probability of being cost-effective compared to TAU at the NICE £30,000 threshold.
Conclusion
In its current resource-intensive form, RO DBT was not a cost-effective use of resources in the UK NHS.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454