Regulating Grand Challenges: The Evolution of Human Resource Managers' Framing of the UK Gender Pay Gap Regulations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

It has been argued that the absence of research into how HR practitioners interact with the legal context is an important omission in HRM scholarship. Drawing on longitudinal interview data, this paper addresses this research gap by examining how HR managers frame a new legal mandate, namely the gender pay gap regulations, and how those frames evolve over time. The study finds that HR managers seek to make sense of the regulations through a diagnostic frame of organisational risk composed of three elements, namely uncertainty, ambiguity, and opportunity cost. Two types of prognostic frame are also invoked to understand the regulations, firstly as a risk to be mitigated through normalisation, neutralisation, and disassociation, and secondly, as an opportunity to be leveraged as an impetus for change and an enhancer of HR's influence. The study sheds light on the factors that affect the nature and evolution of frames, including the extent of stakeholder interest and internal engagement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)728-741
Number of pages14
JournalHUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL
Volume35
Issue number3
Early online date30 Jan 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2025

Keywords

  • frames
  • gender pay gap regulations
  • HR managers
  • legal context
  • opportunity
  • risk

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Regulating Grand Challenges: The Evolution of Human Resource Managers' Framing of the UK Gender Pay Gap Regulations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this