Remote consultations in mental health: collaborative evaluation applying learning health systems thinking

MOMENT group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

AIMS AND METHOD: A collaborative evaluation of remote consultations in mental health services was undertaken by mental health service providers, experts by experience, academic institutions and a Health Innovation Network in south London, UK. 'Learning healthcare systems' thinking was applied. Workstream 1 reviewed international published evidence; workstream 2 synthesised findings from three health provider surveys of the perceptions and experiences of staff, patients and carers; and workstream 3 comprised an electronic survey on local projects.

RESULTS: Remote consultations can be acceptable to patients and staff. They improve access for some while restricting access for others, with digital exclusion being a key concern. Providing tailored choice is key.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The collaboration generated learning to inform choices by healthcare providers to embed or adapt remote delivery. A key output was freely downloadable survey questions for assessing the quantity and quality of appointments undertaken by phone or video or face to face.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalBJPsych Bulletin
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2 Dec 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Remote consultations in mental health: collaborative evaluation applying learning health systems thinking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this