Reply to Response to Vacuous standards - Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process

Geoffrey Stewart Morrison, Cedric Neumann, Patrick Henry Geoghegan, Gary Edmond, Tim Grant, R Brent Ostrum, Paul Roberts, Michael Saks, Denise Syndercombe Court, William C Thompson, Sandy Zabell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This Letter to the Editor is a reply to Mohammed et al. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145, which in turn is a response to Morrison et al. (2020) "Vacuous standards - subversion of the OSAC standards-development process" https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005. [Abstract copyright: © 2021 The Author(s).]
Original languageEnglish
Article number100149
JournalForensic science international. Synergy
Volume3
Early online date3 May 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 May 2021

Keywords

  • Forensic science
  • Validation
  • Method validation
  • Standard
  • Quality management

Cite this