Reproducibility of findings in modern PET neuroimaging: insight from the NRM2018 grand challenge

and the Grand Challenge Participants#

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The reproducibility of findings is a compelling methodological problem that the neuroimaging community is facing these days. The lack of standardized pipelines for image processing, quantification and statistics plays a major role in the variability and interpretation of results, even when the same data are analysed. This problem is well-known in MRI studies, where the indisputable value of the method has been complicated by a number of studies that produce discrepant results. However, any research domain with complex data and flexible analytical procedures can experience a similar lack of reproducibility. In this paper we investigate this issue for brain PET imaging. During the 2018 NeuroReceptor Mapping conference, the brain PET community was challenged with a computational contest involving a simulated neurotransmitter release experiment. Fourteen international teams analysed the same imaging dataset, for which the ground-truth was known. Despite a plurality of methods, the solutions were consistent across participants, although not identical. These results should create awareness that the increased sharing of PET data alone will only be one component of enhancing confidence in neuroimaging results and that it will be important to complement this with full details of the analysis pipelines and procedures that have been used to quantify data.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2778-2796
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism
Volume41
Issue number10
Early online date17 May 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reproducibility of findings in modern PET neuroimaging: insight from the NRM2018 grand challenge'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this