TY - JOUR
T1 - Rethinking Citizen Competence
T2 - A New Theoretical and Empirical Framework
AU - Klein, Steven
AU - Porter, Ethan
PY - 2025/6/23
Y1 - 2025/6/23
N2 - Skeptics charge that ordinary citizens are not competent enough to sustain democracy. We challenge this assessment on empirical and theoretical grounds. Theoretically, we provide a new typology for assessing citizen competence. We distinguish the democratic values of reliability, accountability, and inclusive equality, mapping the different competencies implied by each. Empirically, we show that recent research, focused primarily on Americans but with some analogues in other regions, significantly undercuts common worries about citizen competence. We then delineate a solutions-oriented, theoretically-informed approach to studying citizen competence, one which would focus more on systemic rather than individual-level interventions.
AB - Skeptics charge that ordinary citizens are not competent enough to sustain democracy. We challenge this assessment on empirical and theoretical grounds. Theoretically, we provide a new typology for assessing citizen competence. We distinguish the democratic values of reliability, accountability, and inclusive equality, mapping the different competencies implied by each. Empirically, we show that recent research, focused primarily on Americans but with some analogues in other regions, significantly undercuts common worries about citizen competence. We then delineate a solutions-oriented, theoretically-informed approach to studying citizen competence, one which would focus more on systemic rather than individual-level interventions.
M3 - Article
SN - 0007-1234
JO - BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE
JF - BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE
ER -