Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Revising Sangiovanni's reciprocity-based internationalism: towards international egalitarian obligations. / Heaney, Conor.
In: Ethics & Global Politics, Vol. 9, 2016.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Revising Sangiovanni's reciprocity-based internationalism: towards international egalitarian obligations
AU - Heaney, Conor
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - To whom do we owe obligations of socio-economic justice? How are such obligations generated? Internationalism denotes a range of approaches to these questions. This paper examines Andrea Sangiovanni's—an internationalist—response to these questions. Sangiovanni argues that we owe egalitarian obligations only to those in the state, and that egalitarian obligations are generated through relationships of ‘reciprocity’. His is a ‘reciprocity-based internationalism’ (RBI). RBI has two components—one normative and another empirical. In this paper, I will assume the normative component, but reject its empirical component. My rejection of the empirical component has normative implications for RBI, which generate egalitarian obligations beyond the state. In other words, my revision of RBI is an argument in favour of international egalitarian obligations not generated through cosmopolitanism, but through internationalism.
AB - To whom do we owe obligations of socio-economic justice? How are such obligations generated? Internationalism denotes a range of approaches to these questions. This paper examines Andrea Sangiovanni's—an internationalist—response to these questions. Sangiovanni argues that we owe egalitarian obligations only to those in the state, and that egalitarian obligations are generated through relationships of ‘reciprocity’. His is a ‘reciprocity-based internationalism’ (RBI). RBI has two components—one normative and another empirical. In this paper, I will assume the normative component, but reject its empirical component. My rejection of the empirical component has normative implications for RBI, which generate egalitarian obligations beyond the state. In other words, my revision of RBI is an argument in favour of international egalitarian obligations not generated through cosmopolitanism, but through internationalism.
U2 - https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v9.29861
DO - https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v9.29861
M3 - Article
VL - 9
JO - Ethics & Global Politics
JF - Ethics & Global Politics
SN - 1654-6369
ER -
King's College London - Homepage
© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454