Abstract
This paper revisits the central ontological claim in the production of nature thesis, Neil Smith’s proposition that labour is at the heart of the mutual co-production of nature and society. Surveying Smith’s work and others, we argue that there is a danger of losing the embodied, historically and geographically specific practices that are so central to the making of natures. Turning to the work of Antonio Gramsci, we find crucial resources that enable a historicized and geographically contextualized understanding of the making of natures.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | N/A |
Pages (from-to) | 234-252 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Progress in Human Geography |
Volume | 37 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 7 Jun 2012 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2013 |