Projects per year
Abstract
This chapter will argue that risk communication, risk perception, and behavior must be recognized as foundations of effective national security, and that policies and practices that do not incorporate the concepts underpinning effective risk communication are bound to fail. In doing so, this chapter will provide a detailed explanation of the primary drivers and, thus, the primary targets of all risk communication: risk perception and behavior. It will explain how risk perceptions influence the psychological and behavioral responses that play a key role in determining health, social, and economic impacts of extreme events. It will then unpack the relationship between risk communication, risk perception, and behavior. This will entail an exploration of the underlying issues informing expert and public variations in perceived risk, the identification of likely behavioral reactions to extreme events, and an illustration of the ways in which effective risk communication can mitigate negative impacts by reducing unnecessary care seeking and increasing compliance with official guidance. Finally, this chapter suggests steps that can be taken to better enable practitioners and policy makers to develop risk communication messages and emergency response programs capable of informing public perceptions of risk and positive health behaviors.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Strategic Intelligence Management |
Subtitle of host publication | National Security Imperatives and Information and Communications Technologies |
Editors | Babak Akjgar, Simeon Yates |
Publisher | Butterworth-Heinemann |
Chapter | 6 |
Pages | 66-74 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Edition | 1st |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780124072190 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780124071919 |
Publication status | Published - 26 Feb 2013 |
Keywords
- Ris communication
- Risk perception
- Behaviour
- National security
- Extreme events
- Psychology
- Disaster
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Risk communication, risk perception and behaviour as foundations of effective national security practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 2 Finished
-
CIETOOLKIT Project: the public health response to chemical incident emergencies
Rogers, B. (Primary Investigator), Neumann, P. (Co-Investigator), Rubin, J. (Co-Investigator), Wessely, S. (Co-Investigator) & Zimmerman, P. (Co-Investigator)
1/01/2008 → 30/06/2011
Project: Research
-
Public Intentions and information needs following biological and RAdiological TErrorism - PIRATE
Rogers, B. (Primary Investigator), Rubin, J. (Co-Investigator), Wessely, S. (Co-Investigator) & Zimmerman, P. (Co-Investigator)
1/12/2007 → 31/07/2010
Project: Research
-
A question of credibility: A focus group study examining the experiences of workers attending counter-terrorism training in UK crowded places
Aplin, D. & Rogers, B., 4 Jun 2024, In: The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles. 97, 2, p. 297-314 18 p., 0032258X2311749.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile71 Downloads (Pure) -
Delivering extreme event preparedness education in schools: A systematic review of educational preparedness resources available in England
Hodson, A., Pearce, J., Amlot, R. & Rogers, B., Jan 2024, In: International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 100, 25 p., 104171.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
Open Access -
Manchester Attack: What can be done to make public spaces safer?
Rogers, M. B., 24 May 2017, BBC News.Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article
Open Access