Rivaroxaban for stroke patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (RISAPS): protocol for a randomized controlled, phase IIb proof-of-principle trial

Prabal Mittal*, Rafael Gafoor, Zara Sayar, Maria Efthymiou, Ibrahim Tohidi-Esfahani, Stella Appiah-Cubi, Deepa J. Arachchillage, David Atkinson, Ekaterina Bordea, M. Jorge Cardoso, Emilia Caverly, Arvind Chandratheva, Marisa Chau, Nick Freemantle, Carolyn Gates, H. Rolf Ja¨ger, Arvind Kaul, Chris Mitchell, Hanh Nguyen, Bunis PackhamJaye Paskell, Jignesh P. Patel, Chris Round, Giovanni Sanna, Abbas Zaidi, David J. Werring, David Isenberg, Hannah Cohen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Optimal secondary prevention antithrombotic therapy for patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)-associated ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or other ischemic brain injury is undefined. The standard of care, warfarin or other vitamin K antagonists at standard or high intensity (international normalized ratio (INR) target range 2.0-3.0/3.0-4.0, respectively), has well-recognized limitations. Direct oral anticoagulants have several advantages over warfarin, and the potential role of high-dose direct oral anticoagulants vs high-intensity warfarin in this setting merits investigation. Objectives: The Rivaroxaban for Stroke patients with APS trial (RISAPS) seeks to determine whether high-dose rivaroxaban could represent a safe and effective alternative to high-intensity warfarin in adult patients with APS and previous ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or other ischemic brain manifestations. Methods: This phase IIb prospective, randomized, controlled, noninferiority, open-label, proof-of-principle trial compares rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily vs warfarin, target INR range 3.0-4.0. The sample size target is 40 participants. Triple antiphospholipid antibody-positive patients are excluded. The primary efficacy outcome is the rate of change in brain white matter hyperintensity volume on magnetic resonance imaging, a surrogate marker of presumed ischemic damage, between baseline and 24 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes include additional neuroradiological and clinical measures of efficacy and safety. Exploratory outcomes include high-dose rivaroxaban pharmacokinetic modeling. Conclusion: Should RISAPS demonstrate noninferior efficacy and safety of high-dose rivaroxaban in this APS subgroup, it could justify larger prospective randomized controlled trials.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102468
JournalResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis
Volume8
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2024

Keywords

  • antiphospholipid syndrome
  • ischemic stroke
  • rivaroxaban
  • thrombosis
  • warfarin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rivaroxaban for stroke patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (RISAPS): protocol for a randomized controlled, phase IIb proof-of-principle trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this