Abstract
Russellians can have a no proposition view of empty names. I will defend this theory against the problem of meaningfulness, and show that the theory is in general well motivated. My solution to the problem of meaningfulness is that speakers’ judgements about meaningfulness are tracking grammaticality, and not propositional content.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 670-691 |
Journal | Inquiry |
Volume | 61 |
Issue number | 7 |
Early online date | 18 Sept 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 3 Oct 2018 |
Keywords
- direct reference
- empty names
- propositions
- Russellianism