Abstract
Views that treat the contents of sentences as structured, Russellian propositions face a problem with empty names. It seems that those sorts of things cannot be the contents of sentences containing such names. I motivate and defend a solution to the problem according to which a sentence may have a singular proposition as its content at one time, and a nonsingular one at another. When the name is empty the content is a nonsingular Russellian structured proposition; when the name is not empty the content is a singular Russellian structured proposition.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | SYNTHESE |
Early online date | 5 Oct 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 5 Oct 2018 |
Keywords
- Content
- Empty names
- Propositions
- Reference
- Russellianism