King's College London

Research portal

Same-sex couples in Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v M: identical to Karner and Godin-Mendoza, yet no discrimination"?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Article numberN/A
Pages (from-to)722-735
Number of pages14
JournalEUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW REVIEW
Volume6
Issue numberN/A
Publication statusPublished - 2006

King's Authors

Abstract

Comments on the implications of the House of Lords decision in M v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions on whether a calculation for child support contravened the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 Arts 8 and 14 by discriminating against a non resident mother who was in a homosexual relationship because she was liable for a higher rate of child support than would have been the case had she been in a heterosexual relationship. Considers how the House of Lords distinguished the decisions in Karner v Austria (40016/98) and Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza. Examines whether the differing treatment could be justified under art.14.

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454